Can You See a Baby Move at 20 Weeks
(Natural News) A shocking new report published in the New England Journal of Medicine reveals that when pregnant women are given covid vaccinations during their first or 2nd trimesters, they endure an 82% spontaneous abortion rate, killing four out of 5 unborn babies.
This stunning finding, explained below, is self-evident from the information published in a new study entitled, "Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safe in Significant Persons." Merely as disturbing as the data is the fact that the report authors apparently sought to deliberately obfuscate the truth near vaccines causing spontaneous abortions by obfuscating numbers in their own calculations.
Originally brought to our attention by a Life Site News commodity, we checked with our own science contacts to review the information and double cheque all the math. In doing and so, nosotros were able to confirm two things:
- Yes, the report shows an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions in expectant mothers given covid vaccines during their first or second trimesters.
- Yeah, the study authors either deliberately sought to hide this fact with dishonest obfuscation (explained beneath) or they are incompetent and made a glaring error that brings into question their credibility.
In other words, this study was almost certainly a comprehend-up to try to claim vaccinating pregnant women is perfectly safe. But the study data actually show quite the oppose.
Here's how:
700 of the 827 women were vaccinated in the third trimester
Table iv from the study, shown below, reveals that a total of 827 pregnant women were studied. Out of the 827 women, 700 of them received their first vaccine in their third trimester of pregnancy. This means 127 women (which is 827 – 700) received a vaccine during their first or second trimesters. (Y'all have to read the fine print below the tabular array to see this disclosure.)
Out of the 127 women receiving vaccines during their first or second trimesters, 104 spontaneous abortions occurred earlier their pregnancies striking the twenty-week marker. These are indicated every bit "spontaneous abortions" in the table.
In simple math, 104 spontaneous abortions (during the get-go 20 weeks) out of 127 women who received vaccines in their get-go or 2nd trimesters calculates to an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions among these pregnant women who were vaccinated.
It is important to note that deaths of unborn babies during the tertiary trimester are known as "stillbirths" and non spontaneous abortions. Thus, the spontaneous abortions could not take possibly occurred in women vaccinated during their third trimester, by definition.
Thus, the study authors dishonestly used the wrong denominator of 827 in their "spontaneous abortions" calculation, when they should have used a denominator of 127, which is the number of women receiving vaccines during their outset or second trimesters.
Put some other way, it is impossible for a woman who was vaccinated for the first time during her third trimester to take a "spontaneous ballgame" in the first xx weeks, since they weren't vaccinated during the first 20 weeks (and pregnant women aren't time travelers). Thus, those women shouldn't be included in the denominator used to calculate the spontaneous abortion rate.
The authors of this study should receive an award in the category of, "How to lie with statistics," because they apparently tried to pull a sleight-of-paw trick to make it appear that vaccines are safe for pregnant women. In reality, they seem to be killing more than than 4 out of 5 unborn babies in the first 20 weeks of gestation, at least in this data ready. (Information technology's a minor set of 127 meaning women, so nosotros'd like to see a larger review of many thousands of pregnancies in order to get a more clear picture.)
Apples and oranges, lemons and limes
A simple way to explicate this with a metaphor is to imagine a pocketbook of 50 lemons and fifty limes, with a science study asking the question, "What percentage of lemons are yellow?" The scientists count all the yellow fruit and accomplish the number 50. They mistakenly split up 50 into 100 because there are 100 total piece of fruit, then they declare, "50% of lemons are yellow" because information technology's fifty/100.
But the other 50 pieces of fruit can't possibly be included because they're limes, not lemons. So the correct math is fifty/50, which means 100% of the lemons are yellow. That'southward the right answer.
In this science paper, they are using 827 as the denominator, even when 700 out of those 827 women were only vaccinated in the third trimester, which is long past the time window during which a "spontaneous ballgame" can occur. And since pregnant women aren't time travelers, they tin can't go back in fourth dimension and written report a spontaneous abortion from months earlier.
If vaccine scientists either tin can't do this basic math — or are willfully deceiving the world with dishonest obfuscation of the numbers — then "science" has already failed its core hope: to offer "show-based" conclusions to understand the world around us.
Nevertheless when iv out of 5 meaning women lose their babies in the beginning 20 weeks, these scientists falsely merits the spontaneous ballgame rate is only 12.6%. Why? Considering they're covering up the atrocities of the vaccine for political reasons, most probable.
In fact, the cardinal writer of the study, Tom T. Shimabukuro, is also named in numerous other studies that merits to document agin reactions in diverse vaccines, ranging from rotavirus vaccines to the H1N1 vaccine from 2009. It raises the obvious question: Did Shimabukuro make the same mistake in other studies that ended vaccines posed no pregnant run a risk of adverse events? For example, hither's another written report he co-authored: "Agin events after Fluzone ® Intradermal vaccine reported to the Vaccine Adverse Effect Reporting Organisation (VAERS), 2011-2013."
That study concluded, "Review of VAERS reports did not identify any new or unexpected safe concerns after TIV-ID."
But is that decision based on bad math, similar the study on covid vaccines given to pregnant women? We call for a review of all his methods and conclusions. Possibly this same study architect has made the same systematic error (or perchance a deliberate obfuscation) for many years, spanning many previous studies. It wouldn't be the beginning fourth dimension one author was institute to have made systematic mistakes across dozens of papers and is forced to retract them.
And isn't that what the "scientific method" demands? Peer review. Double checking the math. Albeit to mistakes in conclusions. This is how science progresses, by pointing out errors and demanding they be addressed and corrected. We can't just accept bad math and call it "scientific discipline" when the bad math doesn't check out.
Spike protein injections into pregnant women an "barbarism," warns Dr. Peter McCullough
In the hateful time, it's articulate that 4 out of v pregnancies are being terminated by covid vaccines when those vaccines are given during the first 20 weeks (at least, according to the small information ready we take so far). And that means the "depopulation" aspects of the covid vaccine are working exactly every bit globalists hoped they would.
Remember: Bio-distribution studies (pharmacokinetics) show that covid vaccine fasten proteins direct assault reproductive organs such every bit the ovaries. Given that spike proteins are engineered biological weapons designed to interfere with human cells, it should be no surprise whatsoever that they are achieving a high rate of spontaneous abortions in pregnant women.
I recently interviewed Dr. Peter McCullough, an internal medicine adept and editor of two medical journals. Although he does non characterize this as a depopulation agenda, he agrees that these vaccines are attacking pregnant women and causing more than 80% of unborn babies to be aborted. He calls it an "atrocity" and says the pushing of these vaccines on pregnant women is "shameful." You can hear him in his own words in the following interview:
Brighteon.com/fc2aa0fe-eae0-4c32-bc23-47e6b6ab9d97
All this means that live births may plummet past 3.two million over the next twelvemonth, in the Usa alone, if every pregnant woman is vaccinated during the first twenty weeks of pregnancy. The number of unborn babies being murdered in the womb, in this example, is reaching "holocaust" levels, which is why this is being called a medical "atrocity."
The fields of medicine and science have turned confronting humanity. They are now killing babies past the millions and injecting adults with spike protein bioweapons that are causing strokes, center attacks, deaths and lifelong injury.
The vaccine industry is at war with the human race. And live-born babies are their enemy. Joe Biden'due south land management czar once characterized human children as an "environmental risk."
This is a war. A bioweapons set on. And it goes beyond mere "crimes against humanity." It is a spiritual betrayal of the entire human race by the institutions of science and medicine, both of which long pretended to exist motivated by a desire to help humanity, but are now clearly shown to exist working towards humanity'due south destruction.
Learn more in today's listen-opening State of affairs Update podcast:
Brighteon.com/89677c54-51e3-4139-9af1-093fe160a3a1
Hear a new podcast each weekday at:
https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport
Source: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-01-depopulation-alert-shocking-new-study-reveals-covid-vaccine-terminates-4-out-of-5-pregnancies-via-spontaneous-abortions.html
0 Response to "Can You See a Baby Move at 20 Weeks"
Publicar un comentario